DPD Says Council “Went a Little Too Far” on Microhousing

Yeah. I know. I read that headline from the Puget Sound Business Journal twice too. Was I dreaming? Nope. Here’s what the Director of Planning and Development, Diane Sugimura, said at a forum about affordable housing:

Responding to the outcry among micro-housing foes, the council last fall unanimously approved new regulations. Mini-apartment projects now can be no smaller than 220 square feet, and they have to have a certain number of sinks. Projects in some parts of the city must have some parking, and the projects must go through the design-review process, which is costly for developers but allows neighbors to weigh in on the look of proposed buildings.

Sugimura said she thinks the council went “a little too far.” City officials are hearing that “we will not get units at the $600, $700, $800 [monthly rents] like those were,” she said. “They’re probably now in the four figures.”

Um, can I say, “I told you so” now?

Here’s what we said back when we were fighting Councilmember O’Brien’s legislation las year:

As you consider legislation to further regulate micro-housing and congregate residences, please consider each specific policy decision as many have a negative effect on the availability and affordability of this workforce housing type.  Together, they could effectively kill this housing type altogether.

Councilmember and candidate for re-election Tim Burgess says the Council may take up microhousing again. Where was Burgess last year? Burgess, right after he voted to end microhousing as we’d known it said not to listen to “a few [that] characterize our actions as somehow limiting options” for housing. I sent him an email challenging his rewrite of history. He wrote back. 

Sorry, Roger, we disagree completely on this issue and I’m very comfortable with that.

Remember last year, everyone told us that if we changed incentive zoning in SLU we would cripple development. Right.

Burgess’ snarky point (and deliberate misreading of the policy debate) was that developers complained that if incentive fees went up in South Lake Union building would stop. Nobody ever said that, although that’s what Burgess heard. He applied the same logic to his response. “We saw your data, didn’t read it, wouldn’t believe if we did, and we know that you’ll just build anyway. Because profit.” Wave of the hand.
I was strongly identified with microhousing. After all I live in one. So the issue is one that has become emblematic of the inefficient and ineffective way the City Council is making housing policy, saying they’re worried about higher rents but doing things that contribute to that very problem.  I hope the City will realize its mistake and fix what they’ve done with microhousing. That’ll help. But will they say the same thing about low-rise? Linkage taxes? Why not avoid those problems by listening to the facts now rather than when it’s too late.

Comments are closed.